Skip to main content

User account menu

  • Log in

Languages

  • English

Main navigation

  • About ISSUP

    • ISSUP Rationale
    • Membership
      • Membership Criteria
      • Code of Ethics
      • Who is ISSUP for?
    • News
    • International Partners
    • Governance
    • ISSUP Scientific Council
    • Friends of ISSUP (USA)
    • ISSUP Workshops
      • Bali 2025
      • Thessaloniki 2024
      • Buenos Aires 2023
      • Manila 2022
      • Abu Dhabi 2022
      • International Conference 2021 (Virtual)
      • Africa 2020 (Virtual)
      • Vienna 2019
      • Nairobi 2018
      • Cancún 2017
      • Campinas 2016
      • Bangkok 2015
    • ISSUP Awards
      • Evidence-Based Award
      • Local Initiative Award
      • Services Award
      • Excellence in Training Provision
      • Outstanding Contribution to ISSUP Award
    • In Memoriam
    • Acknowledgements
    • ISSUP Website Guides
    • Contact ISSUP
    • FAQs - Frequently Asked Questions
  • Professional Development

    • Online Learning Hub
      • How to Register
      • UTC Self Led Courses
    • Universal Curricula (UC)
      • Universal Prevention Curriculum
      • Universal Treatment Curriculum
      • Universal Recovery Curriculum
      • Access UPC & UTC
      • Training Providers
      • Becoming a Training Provider
    • Resources
      • Glossary
      • ISSUP Webinars
      • ICAP certification
      • INEP Plus
      • Prevention Insights Video Series
      • Prevention Lists
      • HealthEKnowledge
      • WiRED International
      • Quality in Treatment
      • SPR-ISSUP Prevention Workbook
    • Job Board
  • Knowledge Share

    • Search in the Knowledge Share
    • ADDICTOLOGY Journal
      • Latest Issue
  • National Chapters

    • Africa
      • ISSUP Botswana
      • ISSUP Côte d’Ivoire
      • ISSUP Egypt
      • ISSUP The Gambia
      • ISSUP Kenya
      • ISSUP Namibia
      • ISSUP Nigeria
      • ISSUP South Africa
      • ISSUP Tanzania
      • ISSUP Togo
      • ISSUP Uganda
    • The Americas
      • ISSUP Argentina
      • ISSUP The Bahamas
      • ISSUP Brazil
      • ISSUP Canada
      • ISSUP Chile
      • ISSUP Colombia
      • ISSUP Ecuador
      • ISSUP El Salvador
      • ISSUP Guatemala
      • ISSUP Mexico
      • ISSUP Panama
      • ISSUP Paraguay
      • ISSUP Peru
      • ISSUP United States
    • Asia
      • ISSUP Afghanistan
      • ISSUP India
      • ISSUP Indonesia
      • ISSUP Kazakhstan
      • ISSUP Lebanon
      • ISSUP Malaysia
      • ISSUP in Pakistan
      • ISSUP Philippines
      • ISSUP Qatar
      • ISSUP Sri Lanka
      • ISSUP Thailand
      • ISSUP Türkiye
      • ISSUP United Arab Emirates
      • ISSUP Uzbekistan
      • ISSUP Vietnam
    • Europe
      • ISSUP Czech Republic
      • ISSUP Greece
      • ISSUP Italy
      • ISSUP Spain
      • ISSUP Ukraine
      • ISSUP United Kingdom
    • How to Become a National Chapter
    • ISSUP National Chapters' Advisory Committee
  • Events

    • Search through all events
  • Networks

    • A–Z
  • My ISSUP

    • Member Directory
    • Apply for membership

Alcohol

Everything about alcohol / Todo sobre alcohol
Back to Alcohol main page
Jose Luis Vazquez Martinez

Approaches for creating comparable measures of alcohol use symptoms:Harmonization with eight studies of criminal justice populations

Jose Luis Vazquez Martinez - 11 April 2019

Highlights

Moderated nonlinear factor analysis is a tool for pooled analysis.

MNLFA scores had more desirable properties than pooled cut-scores and sum scores.

MNLFA scores showed strongly predictive validity than other scores.

MNLFA is a promising tool for harmonization in pooled data analysis.

 

Abstract

Background

With increasing data archives comprised of studies with similar measurement, optimal methods for data harmonization and measurement scoring are a pressing need. We compare three methods for harmonizing and scoring the AUDIT as administered with minimal variation across 11 samples from eight study sites within the STTR (Seek-Test-Treat-Retain) Research Harmonization Initiative. Descriptive statistics and predictive validity results for cut-scores, sum scores, and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis scores (MNLFA; a psychometric harmonization method) are presented.

Methods

Across the eight study sites, sample sizes ranged from 50 to 2405 and target populations varied based on sampling frame, location, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The pooled sample included 4667 participants (82% male, 52% Black, 24% White, 13% Hispanic, and 8% Asian/ Pacific Islander; mean age of 38.9 years). Participants completed the AUDIT at baseline in all studies.

Results

After logical harmonization of items, we scored the AUDIT using three methods: published cut-scores, sum scores, and MNLFA. We found greater variation, fewer floor effects, and the ability to directly address missing data in MNLFA scores as compared to cut-scores and sum scores. MNLFA scores showed stronger associations with binge drinking and clearer study differences than did other scores.

Conclusions

MNLFA scores are a promising tool for data harmonization and scoring in pooled data analysis. Model complexity with large multi-study applications, however, may require new statistical advances to fully realize the benefits of this approach.

Full text (PDF) in English
0 comments
Contact Us

Stay Connected

Newsletter

ISSUP is funded by the U.S. Department of State via the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). INL works to keep Americans safe by countering crime, illegal drugs, and instability abroad.

Copyright © International Society of Substance Use Prevention and Treatment Professionals Privacy Policy